Nikon: D90 - D200 - D300 - D3

[Iustin]

Deocamdata la un D200 si inca nu stiu ce obiectiv . . .

De ce D200 si nu D90 care e un frate al lui D300? :-?

[Osho]

Unii spun ca il si intrece, la unele capitole.
Ba chiar K. Rockwell il vede al 2-lea DSLR Nikon - dupa D3.

Si eu as upgrada cu D90, e clar mai bun decat D200, la ~ acelasi pret.
Deci daca nu-l primesti cadou si tre' sa scoti banii, varianta D90 e de preferat de departe.
Si chiar daca as primi cadou D200-le, tot l-as vinde si mi-as lua D90-ul, fara nicio ezitare.

[Kargeras]

Mi-au luat-o inainte Osho si Iustin.

O investitie in D200 nu se justifica, cel putin in absenta vreunui atasament emotional deosebit, indiferent din unghiul din care il privesti.

De ce renunti la SB800 ? 

Offtopic : Osho, K.Rockwell nu e tocmai cea mai buna referinta, fara suparare, desi D90 > D200.

[Osho]

Stiu, am facut si eu misto de el destul, uita-te numai pe aria fun de pe forumul asta. In general nu, nu e o referinta serioasa, referinte serioase in materie de Nikon am amintit pe topicul dedicat lui D90.

Ma refeream doar la faptul ca Rockwell are pe situl lui o comparatie ilustrata D200 - D300 - D3 - D90, la iso mare. Sincer, sharpnessul D90 la 1600/3200 mi s-a parut si mie ca e un pic peste D300.
Ordinea lui KR, in fct de performantele la iso ridicat, era D3 > D90 > D300 > D200. Aici cam asa mi s-a parut si mie.

Cel mai bine insa verificati singuri pe imaging-resource, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.

-
Bine, nu doar asta intra in problema, ci si accesibilitatea si costumizarea din meniuri/butoane, reductia CA pe care o are D90, D-Lighting - asta ca sa lasam D-Movie deoparte. Nu spun ca D90 e superior, dar unele implementari sunt un pic peste D300. Per total, D300 rules, clar, insa D90-ul e extrem de apropiat de el.
Spun din ce-au spus si altii si din ce-a vazut retina mea, deci verificati si voi.

[CodrinB]

Hmm,

With the effects of the camera's JPEG engine removed, the results from the two cameras are much more directly comparable. Despite the greater pixel count of the D90, there's essentially no resolution difference between the two, with the D80 perhaps edging its younger brother in terms of per-pixel sharpness.

si...

Unfortunately, for those people hoping that the D90 would effectively be a half-price D300, the RAW results appear consistent with those from the JPEGs. Although the underlying silicon is likely to be closely related, it's not necessarily safe to assume that it shares the D300's multi-channel read-out, or downstream processing componentry (Nikon's Expeed branding doesn't refer to a specific processor). Most importantly, there is nothing to suggest that the D90 shares the same low-pass filter assembly (which can be more expensive than the sensor itself and would be an obvious place to reduce costs for a camera in this price-bracket), which would explain the difference in per-pixel-sharpness we see here.

De aici: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Sorry pentru offtopic Ionut